The Dobbs Decision (The One That Overturned Roe vs. Wade) Is Not About Abortion

It is about state’s rights. Unless already outlined in the Constitution, the Supreme Court does not have the authority to invent new “rights” out of thin air. Too long have the legislatures of the states been absolute pussies who have relied on an abuse of judicial review to DO THEIR JOBS, by liberal courts. The states MUST make their own laws.

There is no “right to privacy” in the Constitution, or a myriad of other made up rights. In order to become a “right”, it needs an amendment. They have been ignoring the amendment process since the sixties. In addition to Roe, there are others based on the mythical “right to privacy” which also need to go:

Griswold vs. Connecticutt (1965) – the right to contraception

States can decide what forms of contraception are legal within their boundaries. Such as extremely dangerous “morning after pills” for example.

Lawrence vs. Texas (2003) – the right to faggotry

States can decide what sexual behavior is normal, and lawful. We do not have to be forced to accept perversion.

Obergfell vs. Hodges (2015) – the right for faggots to get “married”

States can decide to recognize natural marriage, and deny all others as abnormal. We do not have to be forced to accept deviant unions.

I am sure there are more, but those are the ones Clarence Thomas specifically mentioned.

WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TOLERATE IMAGINARY RIGHTS, TO THE DETRIMENT OF NATURAL RIGHTS, SUCH AS SPEECH AND RELIGION.

I say enough.