I am against any policies or practices that are anti-human. The people running the world are ANTI-HUMAN. They want as high as 95% of the world population dead and gone. They get to pick who.

I am against any policies or practices that are anti-American. If you are a native born American, you have a right to your country. You should not be replaced by 3rd world peasants who are brought in as slaves to work the plantations so the wealthy elites can drive electric cars and fly to climate change symposiums in private jets.

Native includes any of the couple dozen or so ethnicities who have ancestors that some of them came to America over 400 years ago (or walked here even earlier than that). That would include whites, blacks, and a variety of shades in between.

I am against any policies or practices that seek to discriminate based on race or religion. Right now, that would be white people and Christians. The Left is a religion of hate.

If you are anti-human, then I am ANTI-YOU. Pure and simple.

It is about state’s rights. Unless already outlined in the Constitution, the Supreme Court does not have the authority to invent new “rights” out of thin air. Too long have the legislatures of the states been absolute pussies who have relied on an abuse of judicial review to DO THEIR JOBS, by liberal courts. The states MUST make their own laws.

There is no “right to privacy” in the Constitution, or a myriad of other made up rights. In order to become a “right”, it needs an amendment. They have been ignoring the amendment process since the sixties. In addition to Roe, there are others based on the mythical “right to privacy” which also need to go:

Griswold vs. Connecticutt (1965) – the right to contraception

States can decide what forms of contraception are legal within their boundaries. Such as extremely dangerous “morning after pills” for example.

Lawrence vs. Texas (2003) – the right to faggotry

States can decide what sexual behavior is normal, and lawful. We do not have to be forced to accept perversion.

Obergfell vs. Hodges (2015) – the right for faggots to get “married”

States can decide to recognize natural marriage, and deny all others as abnormal. We do not have to be forced to accept deviant unions.

I am sure there are more, but those are the ones Clarence Thomas specifically mentioned.

WE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO TOLERATE IMAGINARY RIGHTS, TO THE DETRIMENT OF NATURAL RIGHTS, SUCH AS SPEECH AND RELIGION.

I say enough.